Frozen snapshot of the SimDemocracy Archives, captured 2026-05-05. Read-only mirror; no edit, no live updates. mypenjustbroke.com

SD v Dick head68 2020 Crim 2

From SimDemocracy Archives
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SD v Dick_head68 [2020] Crim 2

Date of judgment 10th April 2020
Judge Judge CreatingKing
Charges 1 charge of Indecent Exposure (Article 44 of the Criminal Code)
Verdict Guilty of 1 charge of Indecent Exposure
Sentence 2 weeks mute<ref name="remand">Originally no sentence was given. The judge was ordered by the Supreme Court to give a sentence for the crime.</ref>, Parole rescinded
Applicable persuasive precedent
  • Any posts which may lead to people being uncomfortable or get in trouble irl due to sexual contact are NSFW [1]
Appeal

Case partially affirmed by the Supreme Court<ref name="remand" /> in Ivy Cactus, ex parte Dick_head68 (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) [2020] SDSC 9, where it was remanded for a sentence to be added.

JUDGMENT by Judge CreatingKing

[1] My verdict has been reached. First and foremost. I ask those in power to create a more stringent set of guidelines for NSFW content. With that said, I am taking this opportunity to set a standard for NSFW content. It is quite clear that the "borderline NSFW" content has caused some concern for many people on this server. I am of the opinion that if you are posing NSFW content, even if it is for a meme, it should be relegated to be either tagged and censored or relegated to an NSFW channel. As even as a joke, the type of NSFW content posted can lead to and has led to people in general feeling uncomfortable or potentially running into issues IRL. With all this in mind, I find the defendant guilty and rescind his parole. He will serve out the rest of his previous sentence.

[2] Regarding the argument that no one has been previously imprisoned for posting such content, we have to set the bar somewhere, and I am setting it now.


Citations

<references />