Frozen snapshot of the SimDemocracy Archives, captured 2026-05-05. Read-only mirror; no edit, no live updates. mypenjustbroke.com

SD v Ivy Cactus 2025 Crim 111

From SimDemocracy Archives
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SD v Ivy Cactus [2025] Crim 111

Date of judgment 27th July 2025
Judge Judge Heinrich
Charges 1 charge of Stolen Valour
Verdict Not guilty, prosecution found guilty for making a Frivolous Claim
Sentence Prosecutor (Muggy) found guilty, sentenced to no punishment
Applicable persuasive precedent
  • A prosecutor repeatedly bringing and dismissing minor charges without moving forward is grounds for a frivolous claim summary finding, [2]
  • A sentence of no punishment is valid for crimes with no statutory minimum, [2]

JUDGMENT by Judge Heinrich

Verdict

[1] Dismissed for not meeting the standards of being worth the Court's time.

[2] Seeing that a ping did in fact exist, I will summarily find you guilty of making a Frivolous Claim without a punishment.

Citations

<references />