SD v NovaSM [2019] Crim 3

Date of judgment	7th August 2019
Judge	Judge lolcheapboosts
Charges	1 charge of Spam (Article I.B.8 of the Community Standards Amendment)
Verdict	Guilty of 1 charge of Spam
Sentence	12 hours of isolation
Applicable persuasive precedent	It does not matter whether D commits a crime in jest or not, [3] Partially overturned by SD v Mr_Cynical6 [2019] Crim 6

JUDGMENT by Judge lolcheapboosts<ref>Paragraph numbering added retrospectively.</ref>

[1] On one count of spam, the defendant is found guilty and is to be sentenced to 12hr isolation

[2] Although the defendant had stopped after being asked, the initial spam had a negative effect on the community and on the community members

[3] Breaking the law as a joke is still breaking the law