SD v uazehwkddmvpfrh 2025 SDIC 5

SD v uazehwkddmvpfrh [2025] SDIC 5

Date of judgment	30th July 2025
Judge	Judge Terak
Cause	Certification and Sentence under Art. 22 §2.4 of the Constitution
Verdict	Permanent Ban
Applicable persuasive precedent

Certification and Sentencing by Judge Terak

Introduction

[1] The State through the SDBI requested a Certification and Sentence pursuant to Art. 22 § 2.4 of the Constitution.

[2] As evidence the State provided two affidavits sworn under Penalty of Perjury that proved the accused sent them information doxxing a member of SimDemocracy.

Considerations

[3] Doxxing another person violates the Terms of Service of Discord as described in the Community Guidelines No. 3, (see also Reference re Length of Summary Bans [2020] SDSC 22 [9], Spade Law Firm, ex parte State of SimDemocracy (Appellant) v Freax (Respondent) [2020] SDSC 24 [6], et. al.).

[4] The Constitution requires the certification be issued for cases of egregious cases of Terms of Service violations but provides no final clarification on what an egregious case might be. It lists multiple examples though of what constitutes an egregious case, namely a repeated offence in a short amount of time (Art. 22 § 2.4.1.(a)). Given the Affidavit proved the message was sent repeatedly an egregious case is reached.

Sentence

[5] The User uazehwkddmvpfrh (ID: 1391123429742350457) is sentenced to a permanent ban (in line with ppatpat, ex parte State of SimDemocracy (Appellant) v keepbloxburgsafe [2025] SDSC 21 [5]) from SimDemocracy and all its venues. The ban already executed is thereby certified.