SD v vro no 2025 Crim 88

SD v vro_no 2025 Crim 79

Date of judgment	29th June 2025
Judge	Judge Confused
Charges	1 charge of Spamming (Article 50 of the Criminal Code 2020)
Verdict	Guilty plea
Sentence	7 day ban
Applicable persuasive precedent

JUDGMENT by Judge Confused

Introduction

[1] The State has charged the defendant with 1 count of spamming and requested a ban of 7d.

Summary of Facts and Argumentation

[2] The Prosecution presented evidence of the alleged spamming. The Defense entered a plea of GUILTY and requested mitigation.

[3] The State and the defense have both recommended that the defendant be released without further punishment, as the defendant has already spent 7d under arrest and the ban requested was of the same length. This court finds this reasonable.

Verdict

[4] The Defendant is hereby found GUILTY of 1 count of Spamming. The Defendant is sentenced to a ban of 7d. This court finds that the time has already been served under arrest and orders that the Defendant be released.