Frozen snapshot of the SimDemocracy Archives, captured 2026-05-05. Read-only mirror; no edit, no live updates. mypenjustbroke.com

Dominax273 (Appellant) v SD (Respondent) 2025 SDCR 23

From SimDemocracy Archives
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Dominax273 (Appellant) v SD (Respondent) [2025] SDCR 23

Date 8th November 2025
Judges
  • Judge Terak
  • Judge hmquestionable
  • Judge Brandmal
Held
  • Application dismissed.
Ruling 3-0
Applicable precedent

MAJORITY OPINION Per Curiam

Dismissal

[1] The Petitioner has brought before the Court a challenge of their verdict issued on the 2nd of February, for violating §2.5 of the Right to Liberty and Security of the Person, which reads:

§2.5. The lawful suppression, detention, mute, or arrest for the purposes of bringing a person before a competent court to preside over a criminal trial.

[2] Petitioner contends that since they did not have the opportunity to preside over a criminal trial, the verdict in their trial must be overturned.

[3] However, §2.5 did not exist on the 2nd of February, or indeed prior to the 2nd of February. It was passed in the Tricky Wicky and Warranted Warrants Amendment (also known as the “TWWWA”, “Twa wa wa ah”, or “T3WA”), which itself was passed in April. Therefore, the petition is denied.